Memory Alpha

Talk:William Ross

Back to page

Revision as of 12:44, February 25, 2014 by TrekFan (Talk | contribs)

40,397pages on
this wiki


Wow! That is a lot of info crammed in a short page. Is there some kind of limit? If this page cold be elaborated a bit more, it would make a good featured article. -- Redge | Talk 17:45, 12 Aug 2004 (CEST)


In When It Rains... Admiral Ross says he met Gowron at Khitomer. As Gowron was said to be a political outsider before becoming Chancellor it seems unlikely he was at the second Khitomer conference, which have no set date, could there have been another conference on Khitomer in 2373 after the Federation and the Klingon empire became allies again?-Rebelstrike2005 23:55, 12 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Why would there need to be another Khitomer Conference? Ross and Gowron could have met there for any number of reasons. And also, why assume that the Second Khitomer Accords emerged from a second conference? -- Michael Warren | Talk 23:58, 12 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Middle initial

Where was his middle initial being "J" stated? -- Ben Sisko 04:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

"From Starfleet Headquarters, Office of the Admiralty, to Captain Benjamin L. Sisko. As of this date, you are requested and required to take command of U.S.S. Sao Paulo. Signed, Vice Admiral William J. Ross, Stardate 52861.3."
"The Dogs of War". --Alan 03:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


Is there any canon information that this was his flagship? Or was it just a transport (presumably chosen for it's fast speed and decent combat ability, whilst not large enough to really spook the Romulans) 15:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

William Ross, orchestrator

Just a heads up, but one of the orchestrators for Star Trek Generations was a William Ross. While this *character* William J. Ross is obviously more important, i see no point in moving his page for *orchestrator* who is really just a blurb in the whole scheme of things. --Alan 03:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree; Ross the orchestrator should be found at William Ross (orchestrator), although there should be a disambig on this page. Not that anyone would actually be looking for the orchestrator. :-P --From Andoria with Love 03:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I also agree. Besides, it has always seemed the policy for MA to let in-universe canon pages get the natural title.– Cleanse 03:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review - Jan, 2014

After spending the better part of a day on the overhaul of this article, I have now put it up for Peer Review in the hopes I can get some positive constructive feedback on it. For reference, I have more or less rewritten the in-universe content to flow better and I have also added the "Personal relationships" and "Memorable quotes" sections. With regards to background information, I have added several items from the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion and numerous references in apocrypha. I hope anyone reading this will take the time to read it over, and provide their comments below. Thank you. --| TrekFan Open a channel 16:34, January 20, 2014 (UTC)

Is anyone willing to comment on the peer review? --| TrekFan Open a channel 16:24, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

Seems good on a brief read through I have just done. My two suggestions would be that the relationship between himself and Martok could be expanded a little, like you didn't include his distaste of when Martok wanted to drink over the Cardassian bodies in the last Ds9 episode. Also maybe his career could have sub headings splitting into years. --BorgKnight (talk) 17:16, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting! That's true. Though the information is mentioned in the main career section, it might be worth giving it a brief one liner in the relationships section too. Let me know if there's anything else you spot. --| TrekFan Open a channel 19:12, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

On second thoughts, I've removed that small bit from the career section and moved it to the relationships section. I think you're right. It is more fitting that it falls under that heading. --| TrekFan Open a channel 19:17, January 24, 2014 (UTC)

I'm still looking for comments if anyone is interested in having a read over the article? --| TrekFan Open a channel 20:54, January 28, 2014 (UTC)

I think the article is well written and all important information is included. In my opinion I would remove the "see also" links off the "Appendices" section as this is in-universe information and does not belong into the "realworld" portion of the article. The links could be included into the article. Tom (talk) 23:53, February 1, 2014 (UTC)

Now that I think about it, is it even worth having those "See also" links there? You can pretty much get to them through the category links anyway, and via admiral. Think I should remove them completely? --| TrekFan Open a channel 11:24, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

I agree that the "See also" section should be removed - at least by moving the links to a more sensible in-universe location, but probably by removing them completely, as they are redundant. Also, I think the change to add "year sub-headings", although just suggested here, should be reverted. There's no real in-universe logic to separate 2374 stuff from 2375 stuff, and it only highlights the fact that the career section of a high-ranking starfleet officer is strangely incomplete. If the section needs sub-headings because of its length, there should be a more natural way to do so. -- Cid Highwind (talk) 17:36, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

I see your point, Cid. Rather than change it immediately, to avoid constant edits I'll leave it as is for now and see what others have to say so we can get some kind of consensus on the issue, if the sub-headings are needed at all. Thanks for posting your thoughts. --| TrekFan Open a channel 23:24, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

As it's been a few days since my last comment, I've gone ahead and removed the "see also" links at the bottom of the page. --| TrekFan Open a channel 06:48, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

Are there any further comments anyone wishes to make in this peer review? --| TrekFan Open a channel 06:23, February 7, 2014 (UTC)

One last shout out to anyone who may wish to weigh in on this peer review? --| TrekFan Open a channel 23:53, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

Peer review concluded. --| TrekFan Open a channel 12:44, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki