If the Gunman's name is Johnny, should he not be listed on this page?--AndreMcKay 16:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and removed him. He was named, so this isn't the right list for him to be on.--AndreMcKay 23:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for not replying earlier: Johnny was listed here, just with a link to his own page, because he was not credited as Johnny but as "Gunman" in "Clues". If someone missed his name in the episode and would look at the end credits, he wouldn't find the guy, that is why the link to the Johnny page was kept here. --Jörg 23:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
OK, that makes sense. Is there a MA policy on unnamed characters?--AndreMcKay 23:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

News vendor Edit

The news vendor played by Dick Miller is clearly named in the episode by Picard, as "Mac" or "Mack". See the evidence here. I think we should create a page to him instead of listing the character as "unnamed". -- Ltarex 18:02, 21 September 2011 (CET)

The script refers to the character as "Vendor". "Mac" can be used as a form of address when the person's name is not known according to this definition, so it likely was not his name.--31dot 16:19, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
Looking at the actual script here, (the link you provided is a transcription from the episode, not the script), Picard actually calls the Vendor "Joe", although it looks like that was not said in the episode. I'll add it as a Background note.--31dot 16:25, September 21, 2011 (UTC)

Nicky's girls Edit

THE BRUNETTE IS NAMED TRACEY FRAKES! A cousin! 😊 The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk).

If what "Tracey" has posted in this post is true, we ought to leave it (but not formatted as it is currently). But I doubt this person would check their IP address automatic talk page for replies. Could someone who knows how confirm? --LauraCC (talk) 17:38, April 9, 2017 (UTC)
The brunette is Tracey Frakes. 100% positive because I am The Tracey Frakes who got paid to be on set those three days and had fun meeting my cousin Jonathan. So please don't erase this again. The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk).
This is too random to be so harshly doubted or treated as a hoax. Any and all documentation/photos that can be provided to support this are welcome, otherwise we need to consider this, rather than always chasing off people who might actually help provide inside information. --Alan (talk) 13:21, February 23, 2018 (UTC)