Help icon

Maintenance links

Memory Alpha talk pages are for improving the article only.
For general discussion on this episode, visit the ENT forum at The Trek BBS.

Raptors are not canon Edit

This is NOT canon. There was no reference to the Romulan drone ship being called "RAPTOR", in fact the word "RAPTOR" did not once appear in any of the three episodes the "DRONE-SHIP" appeared in... --Gvsualan 05:21, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT)

Featured nominationEdit

  • "United". Self-nominated. Extensive summary with informative pictures! --Defiant | Talk 21:06, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • Supported Tyrant 21:51, 23 Feb 2005 (GMT)Tyrant
    • Opposed -- As long as those 30-some references to the "Raptor" exist in the article, it might as well be non-canon. I've been hell-bent for leather on this and no one seems to catch on, but: the term "RAPTOR" was NEVER EVER used in THIS episode or other two associated with it. It is wrong, it does not belong here. It is either Romulan drone ship or modified-Warbird, or if using Archers terminology, "marauder" (which I would recommend not using either). --Gvsualan 04:40, 25 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • Thanks for drawing my attention to this. I've now deleted the references to "Raptor" in "Babel One", a featured page, and "United". Also, I plan to delete the references to "Raptor" in "The Aenar" soon. Now, what do I do if I want to nominate this page again? --Defiant | Talk 02:32, 27 Feb 2005 (GMT)

costume sale Edit

I removed this "Captain Archer's Starfleet uniform that was cut by Shran's Ushaan-Tor was recently sold by The wardrobe featured a purosely distressed cut area with Archer's red "blood" stains." It didn't seem Kosher to me, but if it is I can clean it up and add it back to the article. Vince 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

As it's not vandalism or speculation it could stay we just need to put the {{incite}} template after it so that if someone does have more information they can add it and it shows up in the list of pages that need citations :) That way people don't have to check the talk page for what was removed that basically just needs a citation of authentication. — Morder 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
It's all nice to incite it, but please fix the links when you re-add the information guys. -- sulfur 00:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)