Not sure which way discussion would go on this: In case future efforts are taken to streamline this data: is an image of the nearly identical second edition needed, or would it be suffficient to include a text note stating the reprint was identical except for the inclusion of a UPC symbol, dfferent cover price, etc.?. --Captain M.K.B. 16:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

That's a possibility. I was tempted to not put the reprint cover online, since at a glance, I couldn't see a difference, until I noticed the extra gold bit at the top. However, in the short term, I figured that I'd put it up for the "completeness" aspect more than anything. -- Sulfur 17:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I'd prefer the second suggestion if changes are as minimal as in this case. If there are completely different covers, both could be presented - but as long as the actual cover art is the same, this seems to be unnecessary. -- Cid Highwind 18:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I made notes in the BG info section of the article about the cover similarity and noted the differences between them. I did, however, leave both covers in for the time being. You're welcome to remove the image if that's the way which we choose to go. -- Sulfur 18:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.