This reference was stated in the film? --Alan 15:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

In the comic. I just explained it.- JustPhil 15:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Not canon then. --Alan 15:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Verdammt.- JustPhil 15:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Teral'nEdit

Deletion rationale

Not canon, only referenced in Star Trek: Countdown. -Rhinecanthus rectangulus 20:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


It's not the name of the weapon? If it is, is there a source besides the comic? --31dot 20:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

So far I haven't found a ref outside of the comic. I hunted for quite a while today. Is there an "official" movie script floating around anywhere? -Rhinecanthus rectangulus 20:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

As I understand it, the comic is based on a story written by the script writers of the film. While the comic is not canon, it might potentially be permissible to use the name of this weapon from it if there is no other source, instead of having an "unnamed Romulan weapon" article. A deleted scene might also shed some light on this matter.--31dot 20:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I suppose Jellyfish (ship) was only ref'd on the movie website, so I can see your point. -Rhinecanthus rectangulus 20:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep. The weapon is referred to as the teral'n in the comic, on the packaging for the Nero toys, and in the novelization (which used the official script). In other words, that's what the writers called it, hence that's what Memory Alpha calls it. --From Andoria with Love 21:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
And I'm sure the exact origin of this name will be explained on the article page before this deletion discussion gets closed (wink, wink, nudge, nudge, add something there already!)... -- Cid Highwind 21:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Admin resolution

While the name was not said in canon, it can be derived from other acceptable sources, so article kept.--31dot 19:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Header Edit

What is the origin of this weapon - since he kills Robau with it it's probably safe for me to "speculate" that it's from the normal timeline. question is should this get a multiple reality header? The weapon itself exists in both but our primary reference is the alternate reality...maybe I'm just over thinking this. — Morder (talk) 10:49, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

I agree, its not an alternate universe weapon as it exists before the divergence of the new universe...this isn't hard people!The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk).