Memory Alpha

Talk:Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (literature)

Back to page

40,422pages on
this wiki

Removed Edit

Removed the Tommyknockers section; presumably that's a homage to Forbidden Planet instead (since Tommyknockers actually predates the ST references). -- Capricorn (talk) 03:54, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

In the novel The Tommyknockers a young boy is lost after being teleported by an alien device to Altair IV .

Help with this? (From merged "Webcomic") Edit

Is this an appropriate way to list these? --LauraCC (talk) 17:07, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Well, we don't generally cover stuff that that is neither canon nor licensed so this page will probably have to be merged at best - but depending on the intended direction info like this might perhaps find a place either as a new section under fan fiction or maybe at Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (literature). -- Capricorn (talk) 19:40, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
I would agree that this be merged into Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (literature). In fact, I think one or two of these are already in there. --| TrekFan Open a channel 21:48, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
I've put up the merge template. Does the original creator have any more input on this? What exactly her plans are for further development in this page might be interesting to know in light of a future merge. -- Capricorn (talk) 16:54, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it's literature - doesn't that refer to novels, non-fiction books etc, as opposed to something that begins online and doesn't always get printed?--LauraCC (talk) 17:07, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

It's a case of logic creep basically; comics were put there for lack of a better place, and once comics were there it was only logical that web comics would also be there. I've been thinking of proposing a split for a while now tbh, the number of mentioned comics is large enough these days that it might make sense. Meh, I suppose today is as good a day to bring that up as any day. -- Capricorn (talk) 17:31, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
A comic is a piece of literature. It's a written thing. It's literature. -- sulfur (talk) 00:55, April 20, 2015 (UTC)
Yes, technically, but I still think the page might benefit from a split; it reads a bit awkward to have books and comics mixed together on that page. For one, every almost every section about comics nescesarily starts with a variant of the phrase "this is a comic". This is the wrong page to discuss that though, sorry. -- Capricorn (talk) 08:41, April 20, 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid I agree with sulfur on this one. Comics, even internet based ones, are a piece of literature. Just because it isn't printed and bound in a book of the traditional sense doesn't mean it isn't a piece of written work that one would read. I still vote for this to be merged into the literature article. --| TrekFan Open a channel 16:08, April 20, 2015 (UTC)
To be perfectly clear; it's not at all about the literary merits of comics (which I'm aware has been a bit of a sore point for comics fans historically); just about how they're rather a different kind of medium then books and I figured it would be more intuitive to make the distinction, especially now that there's enough material for two pages (which wasn't always the case). -- Capricorn (talk) 09:29, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

[], for instance, categorizes the two media separately ("books" and "comics". --LauraCC (talk) 16:58, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

My only concern is that once we separate "comics" from literature, someone will come along and say we need to separate crime shows from the television article or we then need to give "books" it's own article. Where would it end? If it's under literature it's all contained as one list. --| TrekFan Open a channel 21:29, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
Genre is subjective, media type... not at all -- Capricorn (talk) 21:42, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
Merged. Two webcomics are already part of this article, one from the list. Tom (talk) 16:41, April 26, 2015 (UTC)

Split suggestion Edit

Apart from "traditional" literature, this page also included referenced in comics. Having those two categories on two different pages might be more logical, and with the number of comics references steadily increasing, I think by now there's enough info to have two nicely filled pages. -- Capricorn (talk) 17:38, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

I'd really only be inclined to support this right now if it was split like Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (television), which is to say neither version of the split page would use the current title. Otherwise, the page isn't all that long yet, as far as these pages go. - Archduk3 06:18, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
I would support a split into "Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (literature)" and "Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (comics)". The latter one would also feature the webcomic references. Tom (talk) 18:22, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
May I suggest a different idea; keep comics with literature and put webcomics, webvideos, etc as "Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (Internet)". But only for notable ones, not every mention under the sun. --LauraCC (talk) 23:17, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
How about a split of the web content with "Star Trek parodies and pop culture references (web content)" and leave the comics here as there are not that much references? Tom (talk) 13:23, September 20, 2015 (UTC)
Didn't I just say that? (albeit under a different page name) --LauraCC (talk) 16:24, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

I've got to agree with the split suggestion. Novels are nearly always written literature while comics/graphic "novels" rely heavily on a pictorial element to the extent they don't even require written captions. Comics are primarily visual, novels require visualisation.

A compromise might be if the two mediums were kept on the same page but separated into different sections.-RayBell (talk) 08:35, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

Book links Edit

Would it be appropriate to add the Goodreads link to a section on a book that you're referring to here as I have done with "A Thing Of Beauty"? --LauraCC (talk) 15:09, June 24, 2015 (UTC) I would add that there are some books with the same title as's probably a good practice. --LauraCC (talk) 16:22, December 24, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki