m (rep) Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:'''Agreed''', solid reasoning...--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] ([[User talk:Sennim|talk]]) 15:59, November 21, 2015 (UTC) |
:'''Agreed''', solid reasoning...--[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] ([[User talk:Sennim|talk]]) 15:59, November 21, 2015 (UTC) |
||
::Sufficient advertising options could result in a separate advertising article too. In fact, with the modern era (ie [[Esurance]]) and cross-platform marketing, that might be a new topic to consider, especially since this new ad was done in conjunction with {{film|12}} originally. - [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] ([[User talk:Sulfur|talk]]) 16:11, November 21, 2015 (UTC) |
::Sufficient advertising options could result in a separate advertising article too. In fact, with the modern era (ie [[Esurance]]) and cross-platform marketing, that might be a new topic to consider, especially since this new ad was done in conjunction with {{film|12}} originally. - [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] ([[User talk:Sulfur|talk]]) 16:11, November 21, 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::I imagine the rule should be if they made a tie-in deal with paramount or not. If they paid to use ''Star Trek'' then they're in the same class as McDonalds or Esurance and they deserve an article even if the extent of the partnership was very modest. If they didn't, then it's merely a random shoutout and they belong at parodies and pop culture references. -- [[User:Capricorn|Capricorn]] ([[User talk:Capricorn|talk]]) 16:24, November 21, 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:24, 21 November 2015
Merge?
As far as I can see, the company and its product just "used" the image of the Enterprise in their add. Should this be listed at Star Trek parodies and pop culture references in the section "Other parodies and references"? There are several other examples listed on this article about tv spots and ads making use of images from Star Trek. Tom (talk) 15:33, November 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed, solid reasoning...--Sennim (talk) 15:59, November 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Sufficient advertising options could result in a separate advertising article too. In fact, with the modern era (ie Esurance) and cross-platform marketing, that might be a new topic to consider, especially since this new ad was done in conjunction with Star Trek Into Darkness originally. - sulfur (talk) 16:11, November 21, 2015 (UTC)
- I imagine the rule should be if they made a tie-in deal with paramount or not. If they paid to use Star Trek then they're in the same class as McDonalds or Esurance and they deserve an article even if the extent of the partnership was very modest. If they didn't, then it's merely a random shoutout and they belong at parodies and pop culture references. -- Capricorn (talk) 16:24, November 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Sufficient advertising options could result in a separate advertising article too. In fact, with the modern era (ie Esurance) and cross-platform marketing, that might be a new topic to consider, especially since this new ad was done in conjunction with Star Trek Into Darkness originally. - sulfur (talk) 16:11, November 21, 2015 (UTC)