Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
I've noticed that there are several TNG and DS9 novels (such as A Time to... and Millennium that link here. Shouldn't Star Trek (Pocket) be the same as the Star Trek page and refer to Star Trek novels overall, rather than the Original Series?
Content overlap Edit
There seems to be some overlap between this article and Star Trek (Pocket). Can this somehow be resolved by merging, splitting or otherwise better arranging the content? Also, interwiki links would then need to be checked. -- Cid Highwind 19:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing any overlap. Could you elaborate, Cid? -- Michael Warren | Talk 19:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Star Trek not Star Trek: The Original Series Edit
First of all most of these novels are titled Star Trek, not Star Trek: The Original Series (except for The Janus Gate and Errand of Vengeance miniseries. Secondly, the Shatnerverse series, Vulcan's Soul series and some others and clearly not TOS novels since they are set in the 24th century. – 22.214.171.124 01:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- On the latter point, even the 24th century novels still seem to be considered "TOS" novels when they follow primarily the TOS characters, such as Spock, Kirk, Uhura, McCoy, etc. --OuroborosCobra talk 01:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I think the numbered novels and unnumbered novels should be listed in the same section Edit
Take a look at how Wikipedia did it in their page. I think it's a lot less messy than having numbered novels and unnumbered novels listed in separate sections. Does anyone agree? --NetSpiker (talk) 07:00, October 17, 2016 (UTC)
- We're not Wikipedia, and the numbered and unnumbered are separate lists due to their sources separate presentations. -- sulfur (talk) 10:18, October 17, 2016 (UTC)