Fandom

Memory Alpha

Talk:Star Trek: The Original Series (Pocket)

Back to page

41,932pages on
this wiki
Add New Page

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Crossover novelsEdit

I've noticed that there are several TNG and DS9 novels (such as A Time to... and Millennium that link here. Shouldn't Star Trek (Pocket) be the same as the Star Trek page and refer to Star Trek novels overall, rather than the Original Series?

Other novels that would fit this category would be Articles of the Federation as it features characters from TNG, DS9 and VOY. Tough Little Ship 16:19, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The article has been disambiguated -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk 17:57, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Content overlap Edit

There seems to be some overlap between this article and Star Trek (Pocket). Can this somehow be resolved by merging, splitting or otherwise better arranging the content? Also, interwiki links would then need to be checked. -- Cid Highwind 19:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not seeing any overlap. Could you elaborate, Cid? -- Michael Warren | Talk 19:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Star Trek not Star Trek: The Original Series Edit

First of all most of these novels are titled Star Trek, not Star Trek: The Original Series (except for The Janus Gate and Errand of Vengeance miniseries. Secondly, the Shatnerverse series, Vulcan's Soul series and some others and clearly not TOS novels since they are set in the 24th century. – 218.215.146.144 01:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

On the latter point, even the 24th century novels still seem to be considered "TOS" novels when they follow primarily the TOS characters, such as Spock, Kirk, Uhura, McCoy, etc. --OuroborosCobra talk 01:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I think the numbered novels and unnumbered novels should be listed in the same section Edit

Take a look at how Wikipedia did it in their [1]page. I think it's a lot less messy than having numbered novels and unnumbered novels listed in separate sections. Does anyone agree? --NetSpiker (talk) 07:00, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

We're not Wikipedia, and the numbered and unnumbered are separate lists due to their sources separate presentations. -- sulfur (talk) 10:18, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

What do you mean by separate presentations? --NetSpiker (talk) 11:07, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki