Here we are again: McFaddern says sonomic but the scripts [1] says somatic. I've plumped for latter. Which is right, and if 'mine' would this prompt a renaming?--Archer4real (talk) 11:10, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

What was said in the episode would take precedence over the script, though the script spelling could (and should) be noted in a background note. 31dot (talk) 17:46, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Well you add the note; sonomic and somatic have entirely different definitions and this is a clear case of canon being wrong. What happens in these cases, a blind eye? Feel tired and grumpy; Might have a go tomorrow--Archer4real (talk) 19:44, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

In-universe it is certainly possible that this received the name Crusher used at some point in the next 300 years. Real-world, yeah, McFadden probably screwed up the line. I'll add a note. 31dot (talk) 19:53, November 19, 2013 (UTC)