Seems like a good idea to merge this with sonic disruptor since this is associated with that technology, otherwise I might suggest creating the comparably named article like phaser vaporization to associate with phaser. (Which, by the way, I think would be a bad idea.) --Alan 02:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Kennelly 12:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I've renigged on this, this was poorly explained from the start, and with a little research I think I've reestablished it with it's own identity once again. --Alan del Beccio 21:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)