Prototype shipEdit

As the second of its class, doesn't that disqualify Columbia NX-02 from really being considered a prototype? --Captainmike 18:48, 3 Jun 2004 (CEST)

I think the person who included the Columbia may be unaware of the difference between the Starfleet and Federation Starfleet NX designations... Feel free to take it out. -- Michael Warren 19:11, 3 Jun 2004 (CEST)
ETA - It's OK, fixed it myself... -- Michael Warren 19:17, 3 Jun 2004 (CEST)

Wait the NX-02 had new system in it that the NX-01 did not, upgraded hull plating, upgraded nav. dish, and the new systems on the bridge that NX-01 would get in "these are the voyages..." doesn't that make the NX-02 a prototype? The NCC-1701 refit is should fall into a prototype as well, it was so upgraded that Kirk nearly destroyed it in TMP by ordering phaser fire? sithlord123

That's a refit of an existing class, not a new class entirely.– Fadm tyler 18:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Prototype devices Edit

Perhaps we should consider adding a list of prototype devices, much like the list of prototype starships. I wouldn't mine doing it myself (slowly over time), but just want to see if anyone else is interested. - Intricated 23:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

USS NovaEdit

As much as I like the idea, should the Nova be listed here? Registry problems aside it's not mentioned as a prototype on it's page and the class page even lists it as uncertain. There's no production source (that I know of) that can link this Nova to the lead ship like we have with the Intrepid. --Compvox (talk) 23:49, July 20, 2015 (UTC) --Compvox (talk) 09:15, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

I removed

for speculation and the reasons above. --Compvox (talk) 09:10, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.