(→Move: new section) |
(→Move) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I think that her article should be moved to [[Performers whose scenes were cut]] as she filmed her scenes which were replaced in the final version because of the actress change. I see no point why she should have her own article on MA. Opinions? – [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 20:12, September 12, 2010 (UTC) |
I think that her article should be moved to [[Performers whose scenes were cut]] as she filmed her scenes which were replaced in the final version because of the actress change. I see no point why she should have her own article on MA. Opinions? – [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] 20:12, September 12, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :'''Mild oppose''' of a move. I think this is a little different situation as it involves a lead character. That said, I think that if this is moved(which I will not stand in the way of) it should be moved to [[Performers considered for Star Trek roles]], or the small reference to her already on that page should be removed.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 01:19, September 13, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:19, 13 September 2010
Didn't she say " I wasn't trained to play a cartoon character" or something similar"? Tough Little Ship 19:11, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I thought that was just a rumour. Rebel Strike 20:47, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Categories
On her page, she has Category:Performers and Category:VOY performers. Since she never actually appeared in the final version, can she still be considered as a real performer in this way? -Platypus Man | Talk 16:20, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure she got a paycheck for being a performer/VOY performer, so I'm not sure I see that it hurts anything. --Alan del Beccio
Elizabeth or Nicole?
The article says that Kate Mulgrew wanted Janeways name to be changed from Elizabeth to Kathryn... nearly (but not) all other informations about that topic say, that the name was changed from Nicole to Kathryn. Even the picture of Geneviève Bujold referrs to the role as Nicole... what is correct? -- 217.85.65.34 01:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
According to Stephen Edward Poe's book Star Trek: Voyager - A Vision of the Future, it was changed to avoid conflict with natural scientist Elizabeth Janeway. -- Captain M.K.B. 01:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- So why does it say "Nicole" now? --Bp 02:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Changed from "Elisabeth" to "Nicole" because of the scientist at the character design stage, changed from "Nicole" to "Kathryn" at Mulgrew's suggestion. I think.
Move
I think that her article should be moved to Performers whose scenes were cut as she filmed her scenes which were replaced in the final version because of the actress change. I see no point why she should have her own article on MA. Opinions? – Tom 20:12, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Mild oppose of a move. I think this is a little different situation as it involves a lead character. That said, I think that if this is moved(which I will not stand in the way of) it should be moved to Performers considered for Star Trek roles, or the small reference to her already on that page should be removed.--31dot 01:19, September 13, 2010 (UTC)