(→Not in the movie: soft oppose) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I support that course of action. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 22:21, February 17, 2012 (UTC) |
:I support that course of action. --[[User:31dot|31dot]] 22:21, February 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::My preference would be keeping things as they are, just don't see the problem. We've plenty of canon articles of this caliber, often also poorly linked, which I hope we can all agree should never be merged. And you can focus on the non-canon status all you want, but the fact of the matter is that this info ''is'' here, and there's no real reason that different approaches would be more suitable for articles that are otherwise so alike. |
||
| + | ::But, I could live with the proposal. I think a new page would be better then putting it in the bg section of [[Operation Retrieve]] though. The amount of info would take over the article, hence why [[Operation Retrieve star chart locations]] was already spun off. Also such a page could be more neatly categorized in the Unreferenced material category. -- [[User:Capricorn|Capricorn]] 13:52, February 24, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:52, 24 February 2012
Not in the movie
...equals not canon. This should either be merged with the ships' article, or an article for all the unreferenced material from the unused pages of Operation Retrieve. - Archduk3 22:01, August 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I think there could be one page for the personnel from the unseen pages, since all such articles would say the same thing ("X was on the missing page") and no one would know to look for the names on the unseen page if the page was unseen.--31dot 10:32, August 25, 2011 (UTC)
Been a bit, but a bg section on Operation Retrieve might be the best bet for merging all these "one sentence" people and sectors that were on the fourth sheet. All the pages could all be retained as redirects to that section, but it isn't really necessary to have all of these as separate pages if we don't have them in categories other than unreferenced material. I'll be tagging the other pages soon if there aren't any objections. - Archduk3 22:17, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
- I support that course of action. --31dot 22:21, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
- My preference would be keeping things as they are, just don't see the problem. We've plenty of canon articles of this caliber, often also poorly linked, which I hope we can all agree should never be merged. And you can focus on the non-canon status all you want, but the fact of the matter is that this info is here, and there's no real reason that different approaches would be more suitable for articles that are otherwise so alike.
- But, I could live with the proposal. I think a new page would be better then putting it in the bg section of Operation Retrieve though. The amount of info would take over the article, hence why Operation Retrieve star chart locations was already spun off. Also such a page could be more neatly categorized in the Unreferenced material category. -- Capricorn 13:52, February 24, 2012 (UTC)