Re: "Praxis" below "Qo'noS"?Edit

This is an alphabetical listing to quickly find a specific planet. If Praxis stays on this list (after all, it's a moon, not a planet) it should be placed in correct alphabetical order. -- Cid Highwind 11:43, 20 May 2004 (CEST)

No, no... I just want to indicate in that list, that Praxis is a part of the Qo'noS system you know...
Yes, I understood that - I just think that this list is not the best place to do so. Qo'noS should have a link to Praxis as its moon and vice versa; additionally, this relation could be indicated in an article about the Qo'noS system (see: Memory Alpha:Template for Star System). The purpose of this page, however, is to list all Klingon planets in alphabetical order, not to show relations between them. -- Cid Highwind 12:36, 20 May 2004 (CEST)


Just a couple of minor points, but Klach-D'kel-Bract isn't a planet, it s a nebula of sorts, with at least one star system and planet in it. So should it be listed on this page at all? Secondly, it's now called the Briar Patch and in Federation space. Runic code 23rd September 2005 00:13 and 00:16 (GMT)

Article title ./. contentEdit

Why are there stars and "other phenomena" on a list of planets? Will the wonders never cease? :) -- Cid Highwind 13:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Removed speculative noteEdit

Since the expansion of the Klingon Empire is based upon conquest and not the peaceful admission of single planets, we may assume that, if one planet is Klingon, the whole system is seized by the Empire, too.
I can think of at least 47 legitimate reasons why the Klingons woudn't seize a whole system -- Capricorn 15:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Ty to list at least a few then? The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk).
That is quite irrelevant. There is no proof of such a position in the episode, which is why the sentence was removed.--31dot 10:35, October 15, 2009 (UTC)