Do we actually have a reference to this being called an octopus or are we just naming it that because octopus tentacles were used as the prop? -

I agree. If it were Human food, I'd say sure, go ahead, but who knows what the Klingons called it/what it was? --LauraCC (talk) 22:00, January 22, 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, I didn't find the term in the scripts available online, so unless someone can bring a production name for this I propose a merge. Kennelly (talk) 18:18, January 19, 2017 (UTC)
To start off, the term "cephalopod" or "mollusk" would be accurate based on the biological features, versus an indeterminate tentacle count. --Alan del Beccio (talk) 21:38, March 24, 2017 (UTC)
This could go in unnamed food and non-humanoids, if it's definitely a non-plant. --LauraCC (talk) 21:42, March 24, 2017 (UTC)
Makes sense, Support that merge. -- Capricorn (talk) 16:55, March 27, 2017 (UTC)
We probably could also just catalog our food selections by culture, which would give our "unnamed" page a break and more of an identity, unnamed Klingon foods or even Klingon foods. --Alan del Beccio (talk) 15:30, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
Sure, why not? The regular unnamed page could be for things whose origin is not known or if there's only one known example of food from that place. And Klingon food is probably seen/spoken of more often than some other foods of same origin. --LauraCC (talk) 16:25, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
Support merge into "Klingon foods". Seems to make the most sense. --| TrekFan Open a channel 23:01, February 3, 2018 (UTC)