Disambig page Edit

Okay, so we've got the dreadnought starship type, and "Dreadnought" the episode, but there's also Dreadnought the missile. Should this be a disambiguation page? -- Dan Carlson 13:13, 28 Mar 2004 (PST)

Shouldn't the Dreadnought starship class be given its own article? I mean, rather than just being a reference on a disambig page? --From Andoria with Love 03:12, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, what is there now is not standard, I didn't notice at all that there was article content on this page, I stopped reading when I saw the disambiguation tag. -- Kobi - (Talk) 13:26, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I fixed that. Is "(type)" the best possible qualifier, or should another one be used? -- Cid Highwind 13:40, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I don't really have a problem with (type), although without reading the article, it does raise the question of "type of what?" The qualifier (class) might be better, but the same problem may still exist. If you wanna get really specific, you could use (ship). ;) --From Andoria with Love 00:23, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
FWIW - If we're talking about the Dreadoughts from Franz Joseph's semi-canon Starfleet Technical Manual, "Dreadnought" indicates the (type) of ship, like the Constitution-class ships are "Heavy Cruisers". The ship illustrated in the Manual is a Dreadnought of the Federation-class. --Aurelius Kirk 00:45, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)