Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (re)
Line 12: Line 12:
   
 
Correction: The link you gave states possibly 1973 based purely on anecdotal evidence which isn't enough to change this particular entry. And I have yet to see evidence of this "hoax". It will stay until proven otherwise. Unless you have evidence to the contrary the current date will be accepted as it was added by a regular contributor. — [[User:Morder|Morder]] 00:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 
Correction: The link you gave states possibly 1973 based purely on anecdotal evidence which isn't enough to change this particular entry. And I have yet to see evidence of this "hoax". It will stay until proven otherwise. Unless you have evidence to the contrary the current date will be accepted as it was added by a regular contributor. — [[User:Morder|Morder]] 00:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
::The hoax is well-documented [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carafano_v._Metrosplash.com here]. Please do your research before implying that the online hoax did not occur. Remember, maintain a neutral POV.[[Special:Contributions/69.231.215.156|69.231.215.156]] 09:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:07, 17 March 2009

Age

Reverted anon edits - please discuss it here first before you add back your "text" since the only discussion on wikipedia involves anecdotal evidence. — Morder 00:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The 1963 date is, in and of itself, anecdotal evidence based upon a hoax. The Wiki discussion page lists other sites which have an entirely different birthdate. In the interest of accuracy, the birthdate should be removed or listed as questionable and re-directed to a discussion page.69.231.219.184 00:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Considering a majority of sites do, in fact, list the 63 as her birthdate, and the sites listed on your discussion link are user edited and thus, not usable, until proven otherwise it will stay. — Morder 00:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

A "majority of sites" referencing something is not a legitimate argument for including the information if the sites are user-contributed and/or reference a widely-believed hoax. The standard for including information in the bio of a living person is original source verifiability, of which there is none here.69.231.207.173 00:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

OK. I did a little research...she was credited in the movie Confessions of a Serial Killer (1985) as a Blonde Prostitute...if she was born in 1973, as you claim, that would make her 12 when she performed that roll...I find that highly unlikely therefore she was most likely 22 which would make her born in 1963. — Morder 00:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I do not claim she was born in 1973, only that the '63 date is unverified.69.231.207.173 00:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Correction: The link you gave states possibly 1973 based purely on anecdotal evidence which isn't enough to change this particular entry. And I have yet to see evidence of this "hoax". It will stay until proven otherwise. Unless you have evidence to the contrary the current date will be accepted as it was added by a regular contributor. — Morder 00:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The hoax is well-documented here. Please do your research before implying that the online hoax did not occur. Remember, maintain a neutral POV.69.231.215.156 09:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)