Merge with Carrier wave Edit

Seeing as this is a specialized type of carrier wave, I think this should be merged with the main article.--Obey the Fist!! 17:57, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not convinced that it should be merged. It's a type of carrier wave, yes, but it's also specialized and not a standard one. -- sulfur 18:03, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Me, too. If this type of carrier wave was merely a different name for one, then a merge would be fine, but it is not just a different name, it has different properties(difficult to trace) and therefore is not the same as a standard one.--31dot 18:05, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
The more I think about this, the more I would prefer to see us work on the carrier wave article and get all of its references in there. At that point, we can re-assess whether distinct types of carrier waves should have their own separate articles, or whether they should all be in one place. -- sulfur 18:17, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
As I have completed the carrier wave article page, I think this should be merged with carrier wave. --Delta2373 08:52, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I think it should be merged with the carrier wave page. --Delta2373 04:39, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
I tend to agree based on the articles as they are now. - Archduk3 04:51, November 15, 2010 (UTC)