m (No need to keep what is essentially vandalism) |
(→Poimt?: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I agree that it seemed like vandalism, which is why I haven't restored it, but it could perhaps be mentioned as a slang term in a short sentence.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 03:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
I agree that it seemed like vandalism, which is why I haven't restored it, but it could perhaps be mentioned as a slang term in a short sentence.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 03:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Already mentioned— [[User:Vince47|Vince47]] 03:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
:Already mentioned— [[User:Vince47|Vince47]] 03:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Poimt? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | I fail to see any point to this page and I fear it will draw trolls and perverts like moths to a light. Couldn't we delete it? |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/205.250.250.212|205.250.250.212]] 16:25, June 20, 2013 (UTC) (I forgot to log in. My username is TheReturnOfTheKing) |
||
Revision as of 16:25, 20 June 2013
Slang
I see that the addition of "boobs" was reverted, as it did seem like vandalism, but wasn't that word used in Star Trek: Insurrection?--31dot 02:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was, but given the user's other recent edit's i felt vandalism was the intention. even though it's used in canon one time, the term is still slang, not encyclopedic, maybe it could have some small mention.— Vince47 03:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree that it seemed like vandalism, which is why I haven't restored it, but it could perhaps be mentioned as a slang term in a short sentence.--31dot 03:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Already mentioned— Vince47 03:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Poimt?
I fail to see any point to this page and I fear it will draw trolls and perverts like moths to a light. Couldn't we delete it?
205.250.250.212 16:25, June 20, 2013 (UTC) (I forgot to log in. My username is TheReturnOfTheKing)