Should't this be merged with phaser? --From Andoria with Love 14:29, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I'll ask again, shouldn't this be merged with phaser? --From Andoria with Love 07:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- No, many weapons from different races seem to get their own articles, such as Klingon disruptor, Romulan disruptor, and I believe the Cardassian phase disruptor (can't think of the article name, and since I am "officially" on vacation right now, I am not searching for it :P). Considering that we see the Bajoran phasers quite a bit, more than these other weapons, I think it should kept a seperate article. That is, unless you want to merge all of these back into Phaser and Disruptor. --OuroborosCobra talk
15:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but most of those articles are probably over 1 sentance long--monkey2:twice the monkey 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- So label this one as a stub. Simple solution right there. In addition, try following the links, you will see that Klingon disruptor is just one sentence. --OuroborosCobra talk 15:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- 2 sentences--monkey2:twice the monkey 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- No, many weapons from different races seem to get their own articles, such as Klingon disruptor, Romulan disruptor, and I believe the Cardassian phase disruptor (can't think of the article name, and since I am "officially" on vacation right now, I am not searching for it :P). Considering that we see the Bajoran phasers quite a bit, more than these other weapons, I think it should kept a seperate article. That is, unless you want to merge all of these back into Phaser and Disruptor. --OuroborosCobra talk
