Should't this be merged with phaser? --From Andoria with Love 14:29, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'll ask again, shouldn't this be merged with phaser? --From Andoria with Love 07:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
No, many weapons from different races seem to get their own articles, such as Klingon disruptor, Romulan disruptor, and I believe the Cardassian phase disruptor (can't think of the article name, and since I am "officially" on vacation right now, I am not searching for it :P). Considering that we see the Bajoran phasers quite a bit, more than these other weapons, I think it should kept a seperate article. That is, unless you want to merge all of these back into Phaser and Disruptor. --OuroborosCobra talk 15:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but most of those articles are probably over 1 sentance long--monkey2:twice the monkey 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
So label this one as a stub. Simple solution right there. In addition, try following the links, you will see that Klingon disruptor is just one sentence. --OuroborosCobra talk 15:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
2 sentences--monkey2:twice the monkey 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm on vacation, give me a break. Fact is, it is still very short. The stub label would still work. --OuroborosCobra talk 15:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it would probably be a good idea to keep it separate with phaser being the "thing", and the Bajoran phaser being the "who's thing", just like we don't list all species starships on the (what would be) uber-page starship, and why each species has an individual page for each starship page/model/design. --Alan del Beccio 16:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)