Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Article Jumping to Conclusions? Edit
The following lines in the article are suspect to me: "Antigravitons are elementary particles that carry a charge opposite in spin to that of gravitons. They are generated by standard tractor beams." Antigravitons are mentioned in the series, but not their charge or spin - at least as far as I recall. The current (21st century) theory is that a graviton is not a particle of matter such that it is composed of particles that have a charge or spin. I am also not aware of any statement supporting the assertion that they are generated by standard tractor beams.
I propose the article be amended to read:
Antigravitons are a variant of a graviton particle. They are capable of being observed by 24th century Federation science, but have not been shown being created by the Federation. (DS9: "Favor the Bold", "Sacrifice of Angels"; TNG: "Attached")
- Items referring to 'anti' usually have opposite qualities of those of their 'normal' counterpart. Additionally, Trek science isn't always perfect ;) - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 20:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
An antigraviton could, indeed, have an opposite effect. Say, pushing rather than pulling. The point is, neither the show nor the science supports the proposition that a graviton would have "spin" or "charge" as in the current article. I therefore suggest a revision to describe what is in the show without embellishment. Aholland 03:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have made the changes I suggested, in addition to adding another reference. Aholland 06:05, 29 January 2006 (UTC)