Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article reviews

View source

Back to page

m (Dominion War: re)
m (rm Dominion war, Success)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{FARecons}}[[Category:Memory Alpha maintenance|{{PAGENAME}}]]
==Reconfirmations without objections==
==Reconfirmations without objections==
=== [[Dominion War]] ===
{{FA/Dominion War}}
Featured Article #1, all the way back in 2004. I think this one has aged pretty well overall, though there is room for more bg info, so long as we aren't just gong to duplicate stuff directly from the episode articles. I'll have some time to further investigation that matter and do a once over on the text for a few minor things in the next few days, so I'm only tentatively '''supporting''' this for now. The text of the blurb should also most likely be replaced with a section of the article itself, instead of summarizing the whole thing. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 07:17, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
Updated the text of the [[Template:FA/Dominion War|blurb]] to be the opening of the article and did a once over on the text of that as well. I think the final paragraph in the "End of the war" section needs some more work, and I'll be getting to that shortly unless someone beats me to it. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 21:32, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' reconfirmation-I like the readability of a larger event in the ''Star Trek'' history...Sure enough, as a non-native English speaker some once-over concerning grammar, syntax and such might be in order, but I consider that minor. The one thing I might suggest is, is it possible to integrate the logos into the belligerents side-bar? (I'd like one side-bar instead of two) Mind you, this is not to be interpreted as "hold", "oppose" or otherwise, just a suggestion, even if not followed upon my '''support''' stands...[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 22:52, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' reconfirmation- The article still holds up. Also there has been little additional information added to the canon, so it should continue to age well. It's possible that more detail may need to be added to evoke the feel of a Wikipedia article of similar subject matter. But conciseness has it's place and it is also possible, that it's just as well to leave it as it is. As of the date of this remark I see no problems with it. [[User:Rayfire|Rayfire]] 23:31, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' reconfirmation. Still seems like an excellent article.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 00:02, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
*I'll move my '''support''' up from tentative to full. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 09:44, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
==Reconfirmations with objections==
==Reconfirmations with objections==

Revision as of 05:06, March 21, 2012


Reconfirmations without objections

Reconfirmations with objections

Early reconfirmations

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki