Memory Alpha

Changes: Memory Alpha:Featured article reviews

View source

Back to page

(archiving Sisko discussion at Talk:Benjamin Sisko)
(archiving Prototype)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Articles nominated for removal==
==Articles nominated for removal==
===Prototype (episode)===
;[[Prototype (episode)]]
It's got a rambling summary and a bg info section that, (at least) in my opinion, is not written from the right perspective; it's the episode that's under discussion, not the robots! So, I suggest changing the headings & possibly rearranging some of the info, but the info itself can (at least more or less) stay. --[[User:Defiant|Defiant]] 09:45, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
:I cleaned up the background section a bit by putting the more traditional "Story", "Production", "Continuity" etc. headings. Feel free to improve on these. I added a couple of citation requests because some information appears to be assumed rather than based on production info. If they were cited, I'd say the background section would be reasonable enough for a Featured Article; not every episode has as much interesting stuff as say, {{e|The Best of Both Worlds}}. I agree that the wall of text makes a mockery of the term "summary", so unless that is trimmed, and the background cited properly, I '''support''' removal.&ndash; [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 10:29, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
:'''Support'''. or '''Conditional Support'''. The summary section is way too long. Unless that is shortened to be more concise, this article should not be FA. &ndash; [[User:Distantlycharmed|Distantlycharmed]] 17:51, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:27, November 16, 2010


Articles nominated for removal

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki