Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion

Template:Vfd

Pages suggested for deletion

• Non-canon ship articles, see Memory Alpha:Votes for deletion/Ottens, as number of articles too great. -- Michael Warren | Talk 17:57, Aug 7, 2004 (CEST)
  • Deleted.
  • The page Memory Alpha:Votes for deletion/Ottens itself may also be deleted. Ottens 15:14, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)

• Evolution of the Klingon Species - entirely based in non-canon. This information has been removed before from the main Klingon article. -- Michael Warren | Talk 13:53, Aug 18, 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete Ryan123450 21:34, 18 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Destroy it. it's not even one of the better theories i've heard explaining Klingon heads. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 04:47, 19 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Non-canon. Remove. Ottens 11:42, 19 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Yuck, delete it. Alex Peckover 14:35, Aug 20, 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. -- Redge | Talk 01:37, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • get rid of it! -- Kobi 11:55, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. -- Cid Highwind 21:09, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • OK, so it is non-canon, BUT has anyone found a better explanation for the smooth brow/rough forehead inconsistencies ? Until Paramount can come up with a better one than "We don't explain it to outsiders, " I vote it stays. -- Otter 03:02, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Well this article is named contrary to our naming conventions, it contains completely non-canon data that is disallowed by our policy. If something is not specified in a canon source, we are not allowed to simply "make something up." Besides, you don't have the ability to vote in this discussion until you've actually edited a few articles. Sorry. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 03:18, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete it with a passion. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • Deleted -- Michael Warren | Talk 16:00, Aug 25, 2004 (CEST)

• Warp Drive Theory - someone's personal theory on how warp drive works. Original research, non-canon. -- Michael Warren | Talk 13:23, Aug 19, 2004 (CEST)
  • Not the first of that user. Too bad, I rather like these articles. But since it's not canon, Delete. -- Redge | Talk 01:37, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. -- Cid Highwind 21:09, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Yuck, delete. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • I would hardly say yuck with regards to the article. It seems pretty smart to me. For all we know it could be the background explanation for how Warp Drive works to the Trek writers. For that reason alone I vote to KEEP it! Or at least post this information on the talk page of Warp drive. -- Krevaner 21:03, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • It's a mixture of non-canon speculation and sheer fantasy. This cannot be integrated in to main Warp drive page without references at the very least, so my vote stands. Alex Peckover 21:13, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • Deleted -- Michael Warren | Talk 16:00, Aug 25, 2004 (CEST)

• The Guardian of Forever - Unused orphan, there is already an article under Guardian of Forever. Alex Peckover 14:35, Aug 20, 2004 (CEST)
  • I have merged notable information. Redirect. Please remember to add {{msg:deletion}} to nominated pages. -- Michael Warren | Talk 14:49, Aug 20, 2004 (CEST)
    • Okay, then, keep the parts you've moved and redirect. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • Redirect. -- Redge | Talk 01:37, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)

• Alternative Kirk Chronology - first sentence says it all. Someone's personal take on Kirk's career history - original research. -- Michael Warren | Talk 00:42, Aug 21, 2004 (CEST)
  • How can Cannon compare to on screen facts. It is based of the 100 year parallel between "Journey to Babel", and "Sarek" (2266). The Calendars you use suggest that the bottle of Romulan Ale 2283 is the best way to figure the date of TOS. But that is a Romulan Date. At least it is a side article rather then posted as a part of the Main article. If there are any Cannon Error's post them on the Discussion page for the Article. TOSrules 15:53, Aug 20, 2004 (PST)
    • I suggest you do it the other way around and adress your problems or suggestions regarding the original article at that article's talk page. If you've made some good discoveries, they should be included in the original article. This page should be deleted. -- Redge | Talk 01:17, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. Non-canon, no references, no wiki links - I think that's all that's wrong with it! -- MiChaos 01:06, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST).
  • I suppose there is some reason to support a deletion. But this is Cannon, in that it is all based off on screen evidence (IE not from books, or games). I'd like to hear more of what other members think. TOSrules | Talk 17:54, 20 Aug 2004 (PST)
  • Delete it. The title is inconsistent with our naming conventions. Problems with the generally accepted timeline should be addressed at Talk:Timeline or Talk:James T. Kirk, but a lot of the "revelations" here seem based on speculation in in conflict with previously accepted facts. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 04:32, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. Seems to be unconfirmed speculation. -- Cid Highwind 21:09, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Is there something more emphatic than just deleting it that we can do to this ? Hit it with a big stick and then delete it. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • I'm not saying keep it, but TOSrules has a point. If this site is totally based of on-screen facts, then there's no more reason to place TWoK in 2385 than 2379. -User:2 of 4
    • Except possibly for a bottle of Romulan ale dated 2283. --64.132.0.250

• Isodesium - A page I created a while ago before I was familiar with MA's canon policy. Something from Star Trek: Voyager: Elite Force -- MiChaos 01:14, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST).
  • Delete. -- Redge | Talk 01:17, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Deleeeete. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel
  • Delete, the author has already said it's non-canon. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)

• Adolf Hitler - absolutely no reference to the Trek universe. --BlueMars 12:49, Aug 21, 2004 (CEST)
  • There are rumours of Hitler "appearing" on Enterprise in this Nazi Alien Story Arc. It's non-Trek so far, but we may end up having an article on him anyway. Ottens 14:16, 21 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • unfortunately: don't delete, Hitler was mentioned in several Star Trek episodes (think Dixon Hill Holonovels; especially Patterns of Force), needs heavy rewrite though -- Kobi 11:55, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • As Kobi said, an article might be appropriate, but not in its current form. Delete, unless it is rewritten to include facts relevant to Trek. -- Cid Highwind 12:40, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST) Keep (Article was rewritten). -- Cid Highwind 17:27, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Rewrite. -- Redge | Talk 14:27, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
    • Rewritten, as a stub: i don't have a complete research of Hitler's mentions in ST universe, however, I'm looking into finding a cap of his appearance in an episode, i looked through "The City on the Edge of Forever" and there were recordings of his voice audible but no visuals. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel
  • so i say keep it. --Captain Mike K. Bartel
  • keep. 66.2.146.67 18:59, 23 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Keep, but rewrite to be more Trek-specific. Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • "Earth, Hitler 1936" Kirk ST6 Hitler is pivotal in several episodes, including "City" thus he existed in the Star Trek Universe. TOSrules | Talk 12:28, 24 Aug 2004 (PST)
    • Except he said "1938", not 36. :-) Alex Peckover 21:34, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • I vote to Keep it. -- Krevaner 19:50, 24 Aug 2004 (CEST)

• The Geometry Of Subspace - non-canon speculation. -- Cid Highwind 21:04, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete -- MiChaos 23:16, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST).
  • Delete. -- Redge | Talk 23:56, 22 Aug 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. -- Alex Peckover 20:41, Aug 23, 2004 (CEST)
  • Delete. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel