Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions))
m (archiving)
Tag: sourceedit
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
   
 
== Admin resolution ==
 
== Admin resolution ==
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
 
 
Archiving until it becomes clearer that it wasn't said. [[User:31dot|31dot]] ([[User talk:31dot|talk]]) 03:00, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
 
Archiving until it becomes clearer that it wasn't said. [[User:31dot|31dot]] ([[User talk:31dot|talk]]) 03:00, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
  +
[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
 
  +
  +
== Resubmitting for deletion rationale ==
  +
I have just watched this episode. There is no mention of Orelious system. There is, however, a mention of Orelious IX. As this system is not mentioned in the episode, I am placing a request that this page be deleted.--[[User:Memphis77|Memphis77]] ([[User talk:Memphis77|talk]]) 12:34, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
I checked the script for this reference. It does not appear in the script. So, with no mention in the episode nor in the script, I believe it is clear that this article should be deleted.--[[User:Memphis77|Memphis77]] ([[User talk:Memphis77|talk]]) 18:32, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
:And no background graphics? -- [[User:LauraCC|LauraCC]] ([[User talk:LauraCC|talk]]) 18:36, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
:If none, '''delete'''. -- [[User:LauraCC|LauraCC]] ([[User talk:LauraCC|talk]]) 20:18, November 30, 2016 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Admin resolution, Part II ==
  +
Deleted. There was no proof of any mention of this system. [[User:ThomasHL|Tom]] ([[User talk:ThomasHL|talk]]) 17:52, December 7, 2016 (UTC)
  +
 
[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|Orelious system]]

Latest revision as of 17:52, 7 December 2016


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Orelious system".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Suggested by Throwback per this discussion. 31dot (talk) 10:32, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

I'm unsure why this article has been put up for speedy deletion. I checked the edit history to see why someone decided to put this on the article. User:Throwback said that it was unmentioned in the episode. I believe it is mentioned. This article should not be deleted. --Delta2373 (talk) 06:25, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

As to why it was done, please see this PfD discussion- but basically, if the phrase "Orelious system" was not specifically said, it shouldn't have a page. Mentioning the planet's name is not enough, as the system could have a different name(Dytallix B is not in the Dytallix system, for example) If you can point out where it was said in the episode, then this will be kept. 31dot (talk) 10:28, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Why was the term "Orelious system" put into the references at the "Booby Trap" page then? That's why I created it because I saw that the link for it was red. --Delta2373 (talk) 15:55, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

As I said, if you know of where it was specifically said, we'll keep it. :) I can't answer why the link was put there, except to speculate it was put there by assumption and not necessarily because it was specifically mentioned. 31dot (talk) 09:25, October 12, 2012 (UTC)

Admin resolution

Archiving until it becomes clearer that it wasn't said. 31dot (talk) 03:00, December 15, 2012 (UTC)


Resubmitting for deletion rationale

I have just watched this episode. There is no mention of Orelious system. There is, however, a mention of Orelious IX. As this system is not mentioned in the episode, I am placing a request that this page be deleted.--Memphis77 (talk) 12:34, March 2, 2016 (UTC)

I checked the script for this reference. It does not appear in the script. So, with no mention in the episode nor in the script, I believe it is clear that this article should be deleted.--Memphis77 (talk) 18:32, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

And no background graphics? -- LauraCC (talk) 18:36, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
If none, delete. -- LauraCC (talk) 20:18, November 30, 2016 (UTC)

Admin resolution, Part II

Deleted. There was no proof of any mention of this system. Tom (talk) 17:52, December 7, 2016 (UTC)