Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
m (Voted)
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
   
 
== Deletion rationale ==
 
== Deletion rationale ==
Fanon created by a user who should know better. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 00:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
+
Fanon created by a user who should know better. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 00:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
 
*'''Delete''' - fanon article, doesn't belong in MA. - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|V. Adm. Enzo Aquarius]] 00:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''' - fanon article, doesn't belong in MA. - [[User:Enzo Aquarius|V. Adm. Enzo Aquarius]] 00:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
* '''Delete'''. Are we at the two day point yet? -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 02:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
* '''Delete'''. Are we at the two day point yet? -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 02:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
**Sadly, no. This is a second article created by the same user, this one today. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 02:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
+
**Sadly, no. This is a second article created by the same user, this one today. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup>[[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span>]]</sup> 02:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Given that this page has little information (none of which is relevant), it can probably be deleted immediately. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 05:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Given that this page has little information (none of which is relevant), it can probably be deleted immediately. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 05:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Since they're blatantly ignoring the rules (and admins) perhaps a ban would be in order? --[[User:Maestro4k|Maestro4k]] 06:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Since they're blatantly ignoring the rules (and admins) perhaps a ban would be in order? --[[User:Maestro4k|Maestro4k]] 06:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
   
 
== Admin resolution ==
 
== Admin resolution ==
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
+
<!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. -->
  +
'''Deleted''' by [[User:Jörg|Jorg]]. Deleted after a shortened time due to its non-[[canon]] nature, and overwhelming consensus. -- [[User:Sulfur|Sulfur]] 13:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
   
[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+
[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 13:00, 15 September 2013


This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Leet".

  • If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
  • If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
  • If a consensus has been reached, an admin will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Fanon created by a user who should know better. --OuroborosCobra talk 00:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Delete - fanon article, doesn't belong in MA. - V. Adm. Enzo Aquarius 00:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Are we at the two day point yet? -- Sulfur 02:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Sadly, no. This is a second article created by the same user, this one today. --OuroborosCobra talk 02:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Given that this page has little information (none of which is relevant), it can probably be deleted immediately. --From Andoria with Love 05:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Since they're blatantly ignoring the rules (and admins) perhaps a ban would be in order? --Maestro4k 06:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Admin resolution

Deleted by Jorg. Deleted after a shortened time due to its non-canon nature, and overwhelming consensus. -- Sulfur 13:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)