Changes: Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Independence class

Revision as of 09:37, 12 November 2009

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Independence class, New orleans class, Dreadnought(non-galaxy), Vulcan warp shuttle, DY 100 sleeper ship".

If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.

Deletion rationale

Orphaned page. Looks like it came from something like an RPG book or the encyclopedia without any canon information. — Morder (talk) 23:36, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Added New orleans class. — Morder (talk) 23:38, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Dreadnought(non-galaxy) and this one. — Morder (talk) 23:40, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Added Vulcan warp shuttle. -Mdettweiler 23:42, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

One more: DY 100 sleeper ship. -Mdettweiler 23:46, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

I see that some of these articles are being merged with their preexistent equivalents. Since none of the information from these articles is being retained, why not simply delete them? -Mdettweiler 00:10, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

When applicable we merge valid articles rather than delete in an assumption of "good faith" there's no reason the user's contributions should be deleted if they're valid. Here they're merged with the existing article on the subject to keep those contributions. — Morder (talk) 00:32, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Delete the remaining three.. - Archduk3:talk 03:57, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, delete since there are no canon references whatsoever to those classes. -Mdettweiler 04:52, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Disagree on the New Orleans-class. While not strictly canon the USS Kyushu has always consistently been referred to as a New orleans-class in production circles especially by Mike Okuda [1]. The name itself is canon as shown here: Starship Mission Status in regard to the USS Thomas Paine. It seems by the way that this is a double dip, there is also an entry as New Orleans-class, merging then?-Sennim 09:16, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Admin resolution

Vulcan warp shuttle was merged with Vulcan long range shuttle. — Morder (talk) 23:46, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Sleeper ship merged with DY-100 class — Morder (talk) 23:49, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 ::'''Delete''' the remaining three.. - [http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/User:Archduk3 <span style="color:#00ff00;">Archduk3:</span>][http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/User_talk:Archduk3 talk] 03:57, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 Agreed, '''delete''' since there are no canon references whatsoever to those classes. -[[User:Mdettweiler|Mdettweiler]] 04:52, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
-:: Disagree on the ''New Orleans''-class. While not strictly canon the {{USS|Kyushu}} has always consistently been referred to as a ''New Orleans''-class in production circles especially by Mike Okuda [http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/okuda359.htm]. The name itself is canon as shown here: [[Starship Mission Status]] in regard to the {{USS|Thomas Paine}}. It seems by the way that this is a double dip, there is also an entry as 'New '''O'''rleans''-class, merging then?-[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 09:16, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
+:: Disagree on the ''New Orleans''-class. While not strictly canon the {{USS|Kyushu}} has always consistently been referred to as a ''New orleans''-class in production circles especially by Mike Okuda [http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/okuda359.htm]. The name itself is canon as shown here: [[Starship Mission Status]] in regard to the {{USS|Thomas Paine}}. It seems by the way that this is a double dip, there is also an entry as ''New '''O'''rleans''-class, merging then?-[[User:Sennim|Sennim]] 09:16, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 == Admin resolution ==