(→Discussion: delete) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived) +[[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions)) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Discussion == |
== Discussion == |
||
*Agreed, '''delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 21:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
*Agreed, '''delete'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 21:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Delete''', I'll second that.--[[User:31dot|31dot]] 21:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Delete''' - otherwise we'll end up as a poor copy of Wikipedia.– [[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] 23:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Delete'''. --[[User:Jörg|Jörg]] 06:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Common Sense''' preceding '''Deletion''': Unless there are others I know absolutely nothing of, there is but a single article connecting to this page, [[47]]. The solution is therefore obvious: instead of linking here, the 47 page should directly link its reference to Wikipedia's apophenia article, and deletion of this one saving both minute memory space and the time of MA writers who will by definition have less to work with and less detail than the Wikipedians. --[[User:ChrisK|ChrisK]] 16:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Admin resolution == |
== Admin resolution == |
||
| + | *'''Deleted'''. --[[User:Shran|From Andoria with Love]] 13:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | <!-- Note to admin: When resolving this deletion discussion, change the category of this page to "[[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions (archived)|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]" to remove it from the listing of active discussions. --> |
||
| − | [[Category:Memory Alpha deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
+ | [[Category:Memory Alpha archived pages for deletion discussions|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
Latest revision as of 12:21, 15 September 2013
This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "Apophenia".
- If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
- If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
- If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".
In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
Deletion rationale
First of all, in terms of POV, this is a real world concept, so no discussions on canon should be held on this topic, secondly, I'm not sure on which criteria we established the inclusion of such Star Trek-based observational phenomena, but to me, this is so far looking like an original research "project", which I believe is what we don't want. --Alan 13:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
- Agreed, delete. --From Andoria with Love 21:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, I'll second that.--31dot 21:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - otherwise we'll end up as a poor copy of Wikipedia.– Cleanse 23:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Jörg 06:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Common Sense preceding Deletion: Unless there are others I know absolutely nothing of, there is but a single article connecting to this page, 47. The solution is therefore obvious: instead of linking here, the 47 page should directly link its reference to Wikipedia's apophenia article, and deletion of this one saving both minute memory space and the time of MA writers who will by definition have less to work with and less detail than the Wikipedians. --ChrisK 16:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Admin resolution
- Deleted. --From Andoria with Love 13:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)