mNo edit summary |
Roscoe3400 (talk | contribs) (-Breen, -Kor, -Orion (species), -William T. Riker, -Star Trek: Armada, -Star Trek: Armada II; successful nominations) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Supported. Lots of good information from different contributors. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET) |
** Supported. Lots of good information from different contributors. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET) |
||
** Seconded. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET) |
** Seconded. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET) |
||
− | |||
− | * [[Breen]]: Worth to be a featured article thanks to numerous contributors. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 15:09, Jan 13, 2005 (CET) |
||
− | **I'll second that, the Breen page is great. --[[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] |
||
− | **It's not great, but its '''far''' more superior than it was before, considering how little information exists, but then again, its better than [[James T. Kirk]], which somehow slipped through the cracks to become featured. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 18:58, 13 Jan 2005 (CET) |
||
− | ** Seconded. All available info is given and presented well. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET) |
||
− | |||
− | * I would like to submit my own work on [[Orion (species)]]. --[[User:Gvsualan|Gvsualan]] 08:09, 9 Jan 2005 (CET) |
||
− | ** Support. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET) |
||
− | ** Seconded. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET) |
||
− | |||
− | * I think [[Star Trek: Armada]] should be a featured article due to Darkhorizons great attention to detail especially in the campaigns section. The [[Star Trek: Armada II]] page is also excellent. --[[User:rebelstrike2005]] 1750, Jan 7, 2005 (GMT) |
||
− | ** Support. Very good work. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET) |
||
− | |||
− | * [[William T. Riker]]. [[User:SmokeDetector47]] significantly expanded this article and it's now worth to be featured. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 16:02, Jan 3, 2005 (CET) |
||
− | ** Support. Thanks for rearranging and adding some images; I was having trouble trying to decide how to use them. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET) |
||
− | ** My God, that's one hell of an article. Definately supported! [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 14:36, 16 Jan 2005 (CET) |
||
− | |||
− | * [[Kor]]. Good and extensive article on the Dahar master. Nicely done [[User:Gvsualan]]. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 00:53, Dec 28, 2004 (CET) |
||
− | * I'll second that. [[User:Tyrant|Tyrant]] 14:26, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)Tyrant |
||
* [[Emissary]]. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET) |
* [[Emissary]]. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --[[User:BlueMars|BlueMars]] 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET) |
Revision as of 01:46, 21 January 2005
Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
- Hirogen: I think i've got everything, and I think it's writen well enough to be featured. Having a second set of eyes scan it over with some scrutiny couldn't hurt. Tyrant 03:06, 17 Jan 2005 (CET)Tyrant
- Supported. --BlueMars 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET)
- USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D): I think all information available on the ship is now included, and it makes a great article. Ottens 13:27, 15 Jan 2005 (CET)
- Supported. Lots of good information from different contributors. -- SmokeDetector47 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET)
- Seconded. --BlueMars 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET)
- Emissary. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --BlueMars 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)
Nominations with objections
- Mission to Horatius. I think that this is a good article that is growing. Luke80.
- I disagree. The article at least needs a cover image, a better "plot summary" and needs to be wikified (including links). Additionally, there still seem to be some errors (NGC 400 vs. 434, for example) -- Cid Highwind 11:21, 2004 Dec 31 (CET)
- Agreed with Cid. Objected, for now. Ottens 14:37, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)
- Equinox, Part I and Equinox, Part II. Self-nomination, just added all details to this episode which I can think of. A few dead links at the moment, but I'm working on them -- MiChaos 19:09, 7 Nov 2004 (CET).