(→Reconfirmations without objections: + Telek R'Mor, re) |
m (I only suggested it, you would think I should know what I'm doing) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Of course, any other comments or suggestions regarding the article are welcome. :-) –[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 01:01, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
Of course, any other comments or suggestions regarding the article are welcome. :-) –[[User:Cleanse|Cleanse]] <small><sup>( [[User talk:Cleanse|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cleanse|contribs]] )</sup></small> 01:01, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | + | *'''Support''' reconfirmation. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 01:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
|
=== [[Telek R'Mor]] === |
=== [[Telek R'Mor]] === |
||
Another good article to start with would be Telek R'Mor, which was made an [[Talk:Telek R'Mor#Featured Article Nomination (25 Febuary 2005, Successful)|FA in Feb 2005]] and whose [[Talk:Telek R'Mor#FA removal discussion (February 2011, Unsuccessful)|FA removal discussion in Feb 2011]] eventually lead to the this page. Removal was suggested because the article was based on only one episode, there is no size or episode requirement, and that it had changed in the intervening 6 years. It survived removal with 3 opposed to the two supporting, and I think it still remains one of the best articles we have. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 01:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
Another good article to start with would be Telek R'Mor, which was made an [[Talk:Telek R'Mor#Featured Article Nomination (25 Febuary 2005, Successful)|FA in Feb 2005]] and whose [[Talk:Telek R'Mor#FA removal discussion (February 2011, Unsuccessful)|FA removal discussion in Feb 2011]] eventually lead to the this page. Removal was suggested because the article was based on only one episode, there is no size or episode requirement, and that it had changed in the intervening 6 years. It survived removal with 3 opposed to the two supporting, and I think it still remains one of the best articles we have. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 01:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | *'''Support''', as indicated above. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 01:40, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Reconfirmations with objections== |
==Reconfirmations with objections== |
||
Revision as of 01:40, 1 December 2011
Template:FARecoms
Reconfirmations without objections
The Way of the Warrior (episode)
I think this is a good one to start with. The article was originally made a FA in April 2005. In March/April 2011, there was an attempt to remove this article, but there was no consensus (2 for, 2 against). The comments of TrekFan and Defiant in that latter discussion suggest that there may be some spelling, grammar and format issues remaining. If these objections remain, they should be resolved if we want to reconfirm this article. (Other objections raised at the removal attempt, such as background citations and page numbers, were resolved)
Of course, any other comments or suggestions regarding the article are welcome. :-) –Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 01:01, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
Telek R'Mor
Another good article to start with would be Telek R'Mor, which was made an FA in Feb 2005 and whose FA removal discussion in Feb 2011 eventually lead to the this page. Removal was suggested because the article was based on only one episode, there is no size or episode requirement, and that it had changed in the intervening 6 years. It survived removal with 3 opposed to the two supporting, and I think it still remains one of the best articles we have. - Archduk3 01:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC)