| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* I '''second''' the motion. — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 13:17, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
* I '''second''' the motion. — [[User:Pd THOR|THOR]] 13:17, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
||
* '''Dispute'''. The problem was easily rectified by transplanting information from [[NX class]] and adding from various other sources... even so, I don't feel as if having information on the NX really enhances the main purpose of the article--to describe sickbay as a whole. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] // [[User_talk:SmokeDetector47|''talk'']] 17:34, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
* '''Dispute'''. The problem was easily rectified by transplanting information from [[NX class]] and adding from various other sources... even so, I don't feel as if having information on the NX really enhances the main purpose of the article--to describe sickbay as a whole. -- [[User:SmokeDetector47|SmokeDetector47]] // [[User_talk:SmokeDetector47|''talk'']] 17:34, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Dispute'''. With the current information on the NX class sickbay there, I think it still deserves featured status. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:43, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
||
===[[Emergence]] (July 13th)=== |
===[[Emergence]] (July 13th)=== |
||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
- Questionable use of pictures<br /> |
- Questionable use of pictures<br /> |
||
Personally, I think that there are better written articles that are '''not''' featured (and probably do not deserve the status as of yet).--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 13:29, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
Personally, I think that there are better written articles that are '''not''' featured (and probably do not deserve the status as of yet).--[[User:Scimitar|Scimitar]] 13:29, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''Second'''. For reasons listed above. [[User:Ottens|Ottens]] 11:43, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 11:43, 14 July 2005
Template:Farc
Articles nominated for removal
Sickbay (July 8th)
This article has featured status, yet it does not say one word about the sickbay of Enterprise NX-01. Unless someone can point out a good reason for why-though I fail to see one as we even had A Night in Sickbay as an ENT episode- I propose to remove sickbay from the featured list. Kennelly 12:56, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- I second the motion. — THOR 13:17, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Dispute. The problem was easily rectified by transplanting information from NX class and adding from various other sources... even so, I don't feel as if having information on the NX really enhances the main purpose of the article--to describe sickbay as a whole. -- SmokeDetector47 // talk 17:34, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Dispute. With the current information on the NX class sickbay there, I think it still deserves featured status. Ottens 11:43, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Emergence (July 13th)
Since the criteria for featured status have become more stringent, I do not feel that this article is any longer worthy of featured status for the following reasons:
- Numerous spelling and grammatical errors
- Absent background information
- Poorly formatted references
- Questionable use of pictures
Personally, I think that there are better written articles that are not featured (and probably do not deserve the status as of yet).--Scimitar 13:29, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Second. For reasons listed above. Ottens 11:43, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)