Template:FeatNom
Nominations without objections
Guy Vardaman
A collaboration between Jorg and myself, with information provided by Vardaman himself. This is a man who has done it all and whose story, I believe, is greatly covered in this article, which also expounds his many contributions to the Star Trek universe. Incredibly detailed and with a proper number of images for illustration, the article provides information not only on Vardaman, but also offers a behind-the-scenes look at certain processes of television production that most people probably never knew existed. It informs the reader on both the individual and his career, which is what a good encyclopedia article should do. Special thanks go to Vardaman, of course. :) --From Andoria with Love 00:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support, obviously. ;) --From Andoria with Love 00:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support, Shran has summed it up all. :-) --Jörg 08:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Great work, and how could I not support an article that says: "He was even Beverly Crusher's torso [once]."? :D -- Cid Highwind 09:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Wow, amazing detail, and lots of great info. --OuroborosCobra talk
12:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC) - Support per reasons above. -- SmokeDetector47( TALK ) 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
*Support because I rock-scissor-papered myself and my left hand won! Right hand always picks paper. --Bp (mirror) 22:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunetly, the above user does not meet the requirements to be eligeable to vote, namely registered for 2 weeks and at least 20 major contributions (he only has 3 total contributions). --OuroborosCobra talk 23:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure you have 20 major contributions if you want to be technical about it. I don't think those star system articles really count as major; they may not even need to exist. Nice job on multitronic though. Anyway, Support the Vardaman thing. :) --Bp 01:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Let's not turn this into an attack on each other's edits, that won't end well. The other username had only 3 total edits, I have 1569. --OuroborosCobra talk 03:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Let's not turn this into an attack on each other's edits, that won't end well. The other username had only 3 total edits, I have 1569. --OuroborosCobra talk
- I'm not sure you have 20 major contributions if you want to be technical about it. I don't think those star system articles really count as major; they may not even need to exist. Nice job on multitronic though. Anyway, Support the Vardaman thing. :) --Bp 01:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunetly, the above user does not meet the requirements to be eligeable to vote, namely registered for 2 weeks and at least 20 major contributions (he only has 3 total contributions). --OuroborosCobra talk
Cardassian
I've been working on this page since I registered, although the majority of it was created by other members and edited and fine-tuned over time by myself as well as them. The article is now quite large in size and contains a vast amount of information about Cardassians, extracting just about every important detail about them. All information is referenced properly, there are no spelling errors I can find, there are no links leading to non-existant pages, and the information provided is thorough and structured very nicely. If there are any suggestions on how to touch up this page to make it better before and feature-article worthy,, let me know, and I'll do my best to clean up the page some more to your satisfaction. I definatly think that this page should be recognized as a featured article due to the vast amount of work put into it and for all the reasons listed above. Thot Prad 18:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: In many of the recent edits, including todays, I have found a number of errors that needed correcting. While I have made these corrections, I have not had a chance to read through the rest of the article, and there may be more of them. This article needs to get reviewed by others in detail. --OuroborosCobra talk
23:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC) - Support. Extremely well written, good elabouration on OOC subjects. — THOR =/\= 00:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- comment - perhaps this should be submitted for peer review first, no? --Alan del Beccio 03:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I will switch it to be under peer review as opposed to a featured article nomination given that there are not enough supports yet for it to be considered a Featured Article - Thot Prad, 17:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)