No edit summary |
(or not...) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It seems to me that there could be an extensive addition to this community of non-canon articles (I'm referring particularly to official Star Trek novels) that would serve to fill a lot of the inherent gaps in Star Trek Canon. You could easily counteract the confusion by creating some kind of red titlebar or header that informs readers that what they are reading is not canon. The works of Peter David, instead of just as casual references, could be mapped and integrated in the community-- while still being significantly seperate from the canon materials and distinguished from them. Any thoughts?-- [[User:Danoz|Danoz]] 04:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
It seems to me that there could be an extensive addition to this community of non-canon articles (I'm referring particularly to official Star Trek novels) that would serve to fill a lot of the inherent gaps in Star Trek Canon. You could easily counteract the confusion by creating some kind of red titlebar or header that informs readers that what they are reading is not canon. The works of Peter David, instead of just as casual references, could be mapped and integrated in the community-- while still being significantly seperate from the canon materials and distinguished from them. Any thoughts?-- [[User:Danoz|Danoz]] 04:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | :Or, people who want the non-canon stuff can use the Wikia devoted to that, the [http://startrek.wikia.com/ Non-canon Star Trek Wiki]. As it is, we are already one of the largest of the wikias, we are doing just fine. --[[User:OuroborosCobra|OuroborosCobra]] <sup> [[User Talk:OuroborosCobra|<span style="color:#00FF00;">talk</span></sup>]] [[Image:Klingon Empire logo.png|18px]] 04:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:59, 1 October 2006
It seems to me that there could be an extensive addition to this community of non-canon articles (I'm referring particularly to official Star Trek novels) that would serve to fill a lot of the inherent gaps in Star Trek Canon. You could easily counteract the confusion by creating some kind of red titlebar or header that informs readers that what they are reading is not canon. The works of Peter David, instead of just as casual references, could be mapped and integrated in the community-- while still being significantly seperate from the canon materials and distinguished from them. Any thoughts?-- Danoz 04:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Or, people who want the non-canon stuff can use the Wikia devoted to that, the Non-canon Star Trek Wiki. As it is, we are already one of the largest of the wikias, we are doing just fine. --OuroborosCobra talk
04:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
