Memory Alpha
Memory Alpha
(New page)
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
As part of this, if there are any templates, or "block" of related templates, that people think should be completely renamed, or if you think we shouldn't "officially" move to this style, now would be a good time to bring it up. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 18:51, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
 
As part of this, if there are any templates, or "block" of related templates, that people think should be completely renamed, or if you think we shouldn't "officially" move to this style, now would be a good time to bring it up. - {{User:Archduk3/Sig/nature}} 18:51, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
:I'm wondering if the "edithint" template names can be simplified so that not as much needs to be typed. It doesn't really bother me a lot, but since suggestions were requested.... :) I'd also wonder if the None Selected template could be renamed to something which seems a little more intuitive. Again, doesn't bother me a great deal but it might be nice to change. I might have more suggestions as I take time to consider them. [[User:31dot|31dot]] 19:39, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:39, 15 April 2012

Forums ForumsTen Forward → Template naming policy (replywatch)

Any quick glance at our templates will show that there isn't much internal consistency with how they are named. Some have all the words capitalized, some don't use any caps, some only cap words that should be, and the use of spaces between words is all over the place.

For awhile now, the trend has been moving towards a more "natural" template naming style, where the template is named as if it were a normal page (with spaces and the normal use of caps), as opposed to the earlier styles of no spaces and all words starting with a capital, or all lowercase. I'm purposing we actually write this trend down, as I think this makes using them much easier since you aren't trying to remember what runes we decided to use in each instance, and update the old templates to this style. At the same time, I think we should also stress simple names over more complex and/or specific ones where there isn't a need for it.

A few of the templates have already been moved to this style over the last few months, and I don't think we necessarily need to abandon the old styles as redirects for the more commonly used ones either, as making several bot runs, or updating them all by hand, will take some time to say the least.

As part of this, if there are any templates, or "block" of related templates, that people think should be completely renamed, or if you think we shouldn't "officially" move to this style, now would be a good time to bring it up. - Archduk3 18:51, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

I'm wondering if the "edithint" template names can be simplified so that not as much needs to be typed. It doesn't really bother me a lot, but since suggestions were requested.... :) I'd also wonder if the None Selected template could be renamed to something which seems a little more intuitive. Again, doesn't bother me a great deal but it might be nice to change. I might have more suggestions as I take time to consider them. 31dot 19:39, April 15, 2012 (UTC)