Record companiesEdit

From Memory Alpha:Category suggestions

The following articles, all in Category:Companies, could have a subcategory of their own, perhaps titled Category:Record companies or Category:Record labels:

Random House Audio and Simon & Schuster might fit in the category too, depending on how it's named and defined. –Josiah Rowe 04:22, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I support the idea, but I'm not crazy about either name. - Archduk3 04:37, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
How about "Music distributors" or "Music publishers"?--31dot 10:01, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I think "Music publishers" is better than "music distributors", but it's worth noting that Peter Pan Records was primarily about stories, not music. For what (little) it's worth, Wikipedia uses Category:Record labels, though I agree that it sounds a bit archaic these days. Perhaps something with "audio" in the title might work? –Josiah Rowe 20:17, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Record labels seems to be the best so far. I'm still not thrilled about it though, but I doubt there's a good name for this anyway. - Archduk3 19:26, October 19, 2010 (UTC)